Wow. It says it right in the article (although they're trying to promote Ceaser by saying it), and Ceaser doesn't even get it. "An obedient dog is not always a happy dog". Exactly Ceaser. Just because you have these extremely obedient dogs, doesn't mean they're happy. Sure, his method of training works, I've seen the results, but personally, I'd rather have my dog be obedient and do what I say because she thinks it's fun, because it makes her happy when I'm happy- not because she's afraid to not be obedient, not because she thinks I'm stronger than her and she better do what I say. And I would think anyone who really loved their dog would feel the same way.
They say positive reinforcers are the ones behind the times. The dogs are truly happier when they're showed who is boss, and corrected (basically a nice term for punished) when they do the wrong thing. But you can clearly see which dogs are happier. For example, when I was at an obedience trial the other day, I was watching as two people competed against eachother. I knew one person, and I had seen the other person train. The first person taught solely using positive reinforcement. The other person taught using the Ceaser Millan kind of training methods. You could see the difference. Very clearly. The first person's dog was wagging his tail the entire time. Having a blast. When they were done, he lavished his owner in kisses. He loved her and he loved obedience. The other person's dog looked pretty indifferent when he was in the ring. He really didn't want to be there. When they finsihed he basically just walked away. Which dog would you rather have?